Spring DI with different styles

Spring as a dependency injection (DI) framework allows us to define our application components' dependency tree in three different ways: XML Annotation Java Config I've written a simple app, bookstore, with the three styles and they're available in the following repository. You can take a look and see how each style would look like. It also has a version that uses no Spring beans for comparison. https://github.com/ryu1kn/spring--working-with-beans Different styles have different pros/cons. Spring lets you mix the styles; so you can change it as you go. Here is my observations on each style. XML-based configuration Pros Weak/loose coupling with Spring framework in your app code. Good for keeping the option of removing Spring later Class dependency information is centralised. Fine-grained control on the dependency definition. Changing only the dependency information doesn't require the recompilation of your app code. Cons Unless you have a good IDE

Golang way

Comments

  1. I was undoubtedly hesitant about spending the cash on a machine that I didn’t know something about or if it might work for me. I took the leap and obtained the D1pro 20W and now I’m very pleased I did. It’s been a learning curve however Double Sided Tape I’ve been capable of to} make some really nice gadgets. Starting to really feel confident in what I’m doing and hoping to start out|to begin} promoting quickly. Production was backed up, however I am pleased to attend for such an excellent product. I put it together in 30 minutes by watching the video by a YouTube channel.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spring DI with different styles

Use Blogger API from its Java client